not guilty: wilco

Comments

Once again, Pitchfork demonstrates how pretentious and smug they are. Excuse me guys, but every band goes through a period of suckitude. It's inescapable, and that's just how the music world works. Nobody's perfect.

Where was all that talk about dad-rock gene back when Being There and Summerteeth came out, let alone the more recent A Ghost is Born?

um... pitchfork is right on this one. "sky blue sky" is a james taylor record. the rest of their catalog sounds like the sex pistols compared to it.
I am with you hotrod. This is easy-listening Wilco. It's, dare I say it, boring.
They may be (are) right as far as "Sky Blue Sky" not holding a candle to their earlier works. That's ok. I can live with that. But they overstepped their bounds saying, "We saw it coming all along...they tried to fool us...but we know better" drivel. That just smacks of smugness to me.
Sparky, everyone knows Pitchfork blows.
they have their moments. but yeah, basically. i'm still gonna check in almost daily, though. and i'm considering somewhat seriously travelling to chicago to see slint at their concert this summer.
I think I need to develop a theory about people who read music reviews and people who don't. There's something there.

I don't read them, unless they are written by my friends (or you hotrod -- ha).

But I know some people who refuse to formulate an opinion until they see what 'everyone' else thinks.
i read some of the reviews - usually of records which i have already made up my mind whether or not i am going to buy. the news is where it's at, though. it's an invaluable resource for finding out who is touring or working in the studio on a new record.
[tries and fails to conceal glee at Wilco getting the "sucks" stamp from the bible of indie rock orthodoxy...clears throat]

I went to see that Wilco documentary with Emma and Hotrod a few years back and was just completely perplexed by the looks of awestruck wonder on the looks of all the the little shoegazers as they left. The arguments between Tweedy and the chubby smoking dude seemed like those of a middle-aged gay couple arguing about who's turn it was to mow the lawn. Heavy Metal Drummer indeed.

As for reviews. Iooooooooove them. I prefer reviews to the actual experience sometimes. Cultural criticism is one of the richest sources of great writing I know.
As for reviews. Iooooooooove them. I prefer reviews to the actual experience sometimes. Cultural criticism is one of the richest sources of great writing I know.

I like the idea of cultural criticism and being a rich source of writing, but often music reviews are nothing but a bunch of fanboys (yes, it seems typically a field dominated by men) wanking all over themselves, trying to prove how much arcane knowledge that have about bands nobody cares about.
...when do you get to the bad part?
I'm sorry Daby, I didn't mean to rain on your indie-hipster fanboy circle jerk.
Wilco was on Sound Opinions yesterday - that was good. My opinion on the new one is still out, however.

Hotrod - you should come to the Pitchfork fest. My indie rock friend only wants to go to Sunday's fest, and I want to do the whole weekend. All those bands for $50? I need new friends.
New Wilco=Watery Domestic. More on that later.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in