hotrod's rhythm n' grammar

Comments

I didn't use caps for like the first six years of my blog, if I could I would kick my own ass. Like you I have no idea why I didn't use them to begin with, but once I started I felt like a sell-out going to standard capitalization. However, once I started typing like a grown-up, I realized how goddamn annoying all smalls is (sorry hotrod. I did, in fact, judge you silently).
I thought it was annoying too. And - I blame Vox. Don't sweat it; this could have been rectified long ago if they'd only paid attention.
Yeah, I ignored that part about the justifying of the paragraphs because I didn't want to point out your wrongness. I hate straight justification because it makes the words space out all goofy. Bleh. Ragged right is where it's at.
e.e. cummings is definitely a genius...and perhaps brilliance is common among those who do not capitalize, but I do vote for the ragged rights of readers not to have rivers of white space running through their prose.
It's not Vox's fault, it's browsers fault. The justify text style element is relatively new and badly implemented across browsers. It would look like ass if the implemented it. I thank them heartedly for leaving the justify out.
Arguments against the Clean Margin Society hold approximately zero water because, Akai, Blogger has been offering full justify formatting for years and, Jodi, it looks great. The raggedy right is balls.
I am sorry, I can't get around that cramped, teeny serifed font to see to the margins.

Ragged Right is where it's at. It gives your readers and words some space to breathe, it doesn't keep them all locked in and regimented in their stringent box.
That's why all printed material has the raggedy right margin, huh? Oh, wait.... Raggedy right is no easier to read but, on the other hand, it looks like shit.

And what's more, I'm not buying this argument that Vox should be given a pass on failing to provide a very basic formatting feature because it's a little bit harder to accomplish. I suppose I could say: "Well sure, I'd like to study the effect of changing currents due to global warming on endangered sea turtles. But the turtles are hard to find because they're, like, rare and stuff. So I'm just gonna stare at these guppies instead." But you won't hear me say that. Sometime you've just got to suck it up and do your fucking job, even if it isn't always easy.


Hotrod is right it looks great to artificially spacewords in order to meet some arbitrary desire for symmetry
I've never seen such debate about justification. What are your thoughts on Helvetica bold?
C'mon Emma, you know by now that there is no subject too inane for us to bicker about.
First of all, I never said it was easier to read. I said it looked better, pay attention.

Also, Emma, I love Helvetica Bold. I actually love the simple beauty of Helvetica whether plain or bold.
but it doesn't look better. it looks like ass.
I pointed to three examples on another blog that are fully justified and don't have wonky spacing. There's no way you people can win this argument, and I am convinced that you are simply disagreeing for the sake of disagreement.
Fully justified text seems to me to have a fairly fascist, totalitarian quality. Suits you.
The text on that other web site, looked cramped and repressed. I felt bad for it. Plus it was widowing like nobody's business.
Fully justified text has a clean, thoughtfully designed quality - which suits me.
...like Germany in 1939
Oh, FUCK THAT. Wanting my blog to look like as much thought and care had gone into the layout as the words does not make me a fascist.
Ya vol.
On the other hand, I don't think I'll ever tire of your Nazi comments. It's code for "I give up. You win. Again."
Whatever you say commandant. Just keep that truncheon away from me.
Wanting a well-thought out design does not make you a Nazi, it's your rigid adherence to the block, justifyed style that does.
I just want what looks best. And clean margins look best.
I actually admire your dedication to clean, nice design. Which is why it stumps me that you hate Apple products so damn much.
The reasons are threefold:

1/ Their design isn't that much better than most PCs.
2/ Their computing power isn't any better than most PCs.

ergo:

3/ There's no reason their products should cost twice as much as most PCs.
1. I think Apple's design (from packaging, to program installation, to customer experience) is so far above the PC's that it cannot even be compared. Seriously, you can tell that Apple has thought of everything when it comes to their products. That's impressive.
they may have thought of everything, but everything they thought was mediocre.
I disagree. Clearly you haven't spent a lot of time using mac products or you were dropped on your head as a child.
My childhood accidents have nothing to do with anything. I have used Macs. I want to throw them across the room.
[this is good]
I love coming home after a hard day of attempting to influence environmental policy to read 30 comments like these. It truly does make it worth getting up and doing it all over again tomorrow.

Not that it matters, but in my (limited) coursework on the topic of designing printed materials, full justified text was almost always considered a no-no except in certain types of publications. Blogs did not, however, exist at that time. And it's a proven fact that writing in ALL CAPS is very difficult for readers to read/comprehend, and is ill-advised. I realize that is beside the point, if, in fact, there is a point.
I think we can all agree about all-caps. Every book and every magazine I have ever seen has had fully justified text.
[this is good]

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in